Why EU residency matters for GDPR posture
EU residency for LLM inference removes the cross-border transfer question for the inference path. Without EU residency, your inference traffic crosses from the EU to the LLM vendor's processing region (often US), which triggers GDPR Chapter V (cross-border transfers) requirements: Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), transfer impact assessment (Schrems II), and additional supervisory authority scrutiny.
With EU residency: the controller (you) processes EU personal data in the EU; the processor (your cloud vendor for Bedrock / Vertex / direct Anthropic) processes the data in the EU; no transfer outside the EU occurs for the inference path. Article 28 processor contract (your DPA with the cloud / Anthropic) still applies, but Chapter V transfer mechanics do not.
This simplifies the DPIA, simplifies the privacy notice to data subjects, and reduces the supervisory authority risk surface significantly. For higher-risk processing (special-category data, vulnerable populations, large-scale monitoring), EU residency is often the practical requirement rather than an optional preference.
Note: EU residency for inference does not eliminate residency questions for adjacent surfaces. Your application's database, your logging infrastructure, your CDN, your analytics — each can be a separate cross-border concern. Audit the full data flow.